Behavioral Science & Ethics USMLE Step 1 Practice Question
A prospective randomized controlled trial evaluates a novel laparoscopic technique for cholecystectomy compared to open surgery. The study enrolls 200 patients from a single tertiary care academic medical center located in an affluent suburban area (median household income $145,000). Inclusion criteria include age 40-65 years, BMI 18.5-29.9 kg/m², no comorbidities, adequate health literacy, and reliable follow-up capacity. The research team intentionally excluded patients with Medicaid or no insurance due to concerns about follow-up compliance. Excluded uninsured patients had mean age 58 years, BMI 31.2 kg/m², multiple comorbidities, and lived >100 miles from the hospital. After 12 months, the novel technique showed superior outcomes (shorter operative time, fewer complications, faster recovery) compared to open surgery. The findings are published and widely adopted by surgeons across the country. Which of the following most threatens the ability to generalize these results to the broader surgical population?
Answer choices
- AMeasurement error in operative time documentation between the two surgical groups
- BRegression to the mean in complication rates among high-risk patients undergoing surgery
- CSelection bias limiting the representativeness of the study populationCorrect answer
- DConfounding by indication due to surgeon preference for laparoscopic versus open approach
- ELoss to follow-up among patients unable to attend postoperative clinic visits
- FHawthorne effect from increased surveillance causing improved outcomes in the intervention group
See the full explanation
Get the correct-answer rationale, why each distractor is wrong, the underlying mechanism, and high-yield associations ā plus adaptive practice that targets your weak areas ā with a free MedBoardPRO account.