Behavioral Science & Ethics USMLE Step 1 Practice Question
A 58-year-old cardiologist has published three peer-reviewed articles in the past 18 months documenting the superiority of a novel PCSK9 inhibitor for reducing cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. His institution's conflict of interest office later discovers that the pharmaceutical manufacturer has been providing him with $75,000 annually as compensation for serving as a consultant and speaker at continuing medical education events. Additionally, he holds stock options in the company valued at approximately $200,000. The cardiologist did not disclose these financial relationships in any of his three publications, though the journal's disclosure policy explicitly requires it. Which of the following represents the most significant ethical violation in this scenario?
Answer choices
- AThe cardiologist engaged in research misconduct by selectively analyzing only favorable trial data
- BThe cardiologist violated patient autonomy by not obtaining informed consent from patients treated with the medication
- CThe cardiologist's failure to disclose substantial financial relationships that could bias his scientific judgment undermines the integrity of the peer-reviewed literatureCorrect answer
- DThe cardiologist exceeded the scope of his clinical authority by publishing data outside his area of expertise
- EThe cardiologist breached confidentiality by publishing patient outcomes without explicit individual consent from each patient
- FThe cardiologist fraudulently obtained research funding by misrepresenting his qualifications to the journal
See the full explanation
Get the correct-answer rationale, why each distractor is wrong, the underlying mechanism, and high-yield associations — plus adaptive practice that targets your weak areas — with a free MedBoardPRO account.